How to write commentary that describes what actually happened
Ask Vizard Agent for a description on each clip, then correct the first draft by naming what did not happen. It re-watches the relevant seconds shot by shot, confirms who actually won the point and by what stroke, and rewrites the line to match, rather than producing another round of plausible-sounding hype.
What do you type into Vizard Agent?
Ask for one description per clip and set the standard in the same breath. The instruction that does the work isn't "make it exciting"; it's that every claim has to be visible in that clip. Vizard Agent can watch a rally and describe it, but you're the one who knows a drop from a net kill.
Prompt
What does Vizard Agent actually do?
When a description is wrong, the tempting fix is to rewrite the sentence, and a sentence rewritten without looking again is just a second guess. So it goes back to the frames. Who won the point is decided in about four frames at the end of a rally, so it samples that end densely and looks. In the session behind this article it:
- Took the user's correction after the first descriptions named strokes that never happened: no leaping smash, no diving save, no kill shot.
- Re-analysed the rally shot by shot rather than re-phrasing the line, and extracted dense frames from its end to see how the point finished.
- Confirmed who won it and by what stroke, rewrote the description to those facts, and re-cut the rally where the clip itself was wrong.
- Analysed the next rally stroke by stroke, confirming the stroke type on frames, then regenerated its caption and commentary segment.
- Compressed the commentary where a corrected line ran long and rebuilt the audio so it stayed in step with the picture.
- Reviewed the finished cut for wording, pace and sync.
When does this not work well?
Verification needs the evidence to be in the frame. Where the decisive moment happens off camera, or too fast for the footage to resolve, no amount of re-watching settles it and the honest answer is a vaguer line. That includes a ball landing out of frame, contact falling between frames at low frame rates, and judged events where scoring isn't decided on screen.
Common questions
Why is the first draft wrong so often? Because fluent sports language is easy to produce and specific claims are hard to verify. Vizard Agent needs to be told to check.
Does correcting one line break the others? No. Vizard Agent rewrites only the one you named.
Does the audio stay in sync? Yes. Vizard Agent rebuilds the track when a line changes length.